Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:54
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
GOP megabill could undermine US energy production, Republicans warn - Politico
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
What we learned from the 2025 Le Mans 24 Hours test day - The Race
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
How much of lounge pianists playing is from repertoire, and how much is improvised?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Why are Americans obese? Is it the food or is it the psychology?
Thank you.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What story do you have involving a public restroom?
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Reality TV star’s son dead at 16: ‘Life is so cruel and unfair’ - AL.com
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?